In a landmark decision, the US appeals court has ruled that Artificial Intelligence (AI) generated art will not be granted copyrights if it lacks a ‘human’ creator. This ruling marks a significant stance in the evolving legal framework around AI and its creations. The court reasoned that the copyright law is designed to reward human creativity and efforts, suggesting AI does not fit this category. While this verdict may seem to limit the protection law extends to works generated by AI, it also poses thought-provoking questions about the definition of creativity and the ramifications AI might have in various sectors. The decision of the US appeals court will undoubtedly influence global conversations surrounding AI, copyright law, and the very notion of creativity. Read More
Leave a Reply